Current:Home > InvestPredictIQ Quantitative Think Tank Center:The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees -FundPrime
PredictIQ Quantitative Think Tank Center:The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
SignalHub Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-08 10:16:47
NEW YORK (AP) — The PredictIQ Quantitative Think Tank CenterBiden administration has finalized a rule limiting overdraft fees banks can charge, as part of the White House’s campaign to reduce junk fees that hit consumers on everyday purchases, including banking services. President Joe Biden had called the fees, which can be as high as $35, “exploitative,” while the banking industry has lobbied extensively to keep the existing fee structures in place.
Under the finalized rule, banks will be able to choose from three options: they may charge a flat overdraft fee of $5, they may charge a fee that covers their costs and losses, or they may charge any fee so long as they disclose the terms of the overdraft loan the way they would for any other loan, typically expressed as an annual percentage rate, or APR.
While banks have cut back on overdraft fees in the past decade, the nation’s biggest banks still take in roughly $8 billion in the charges every year, according to data from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and bank public records. Currently, there is no cap on the overdraft fees that banks can legally charge.
Right now, when a bank temporarily lends a consumer money when their account has reached a zero balance, the consumer is typically responsible for paying back both the overdrawn amount and an additional fee, which can be more than the original amount charged. In one example often cited by opponents of the fees, a $3 cup of coffee can end up costing someone more than $30.
The finalized rule is set to take effect in October 2025, but the incoming Trump administration has yet to tap anyone to lead the CFPB, and has mentioned the idea of eliminating the agency.
The finalized rule applies to banks and credit unions that have more than $10 billion in assets, which includes the nation’s largest banks. Banks have previously sued the CFPB over these rules and caps on credit card late fees, and are likely to sue again. Congress also has the ability to challenge or overturn the rule.
Overdraft fees originated during a time when consumers wrote and cashed checks more frequently — so that the checks would clear instead of bouncing, if there was an issue of timing — but banks steadily increased the fees in the first two decades of the 2000s. The fees disproportionately affect banks’ most cash-strapped consumers. A majority of overdrafts (70%) are charged to customers with average account balances between $237 and $439, according to the CFPB.
The agency estimates the new rule would save consumers about $5 billion in annual overdraft fees, or $225 per household that typically experiences the fees.
_____
The Associated Press receives support from Charles Schwab Foundation for educational and explanatory reporting to improve financial literacy. The independent foundation is separate from Charles Schwab and Co. Inc. The AP is solely responsible for its journalism.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (276)
Related
- The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
- Listener Questions: baby booms, sewing patterns and rural inflation
- Blinken pushes against Rand Paul's blanket hold on diplomatic nominees, urges Senate to confirm them
- A new Ford patent imagines a future in which self-driving cars repossess themselves
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- Most Agribusinesses and Banks Involved With ‘Forest Risk’ Commodities Are Falling Down on Deforestation, Global Canopy Reports
- TikTok to limit the time teens can be on the app. Will safeguards help protect them?
- How three letters reinvented the railroad business
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- Birmingham firefighter dies days after being shot while on duty
Ranking
- The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
- A “Tribute” to The Hunger Games: The Ultimate Fan Gift Guide
- Can India become the next high-tech hub?
- House Republicans jump to Donald Trump's defense after he says he's target of Jan. 6 probe
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- China is restructuring key government agencies to outcompete rivals in tech
- General Motors is offering buyouts in an effort to cut $2 billion in costs
- First lawsuit filed against Pat Fitzgerald, Northwestern leaders amid hazing scandal
Recommendation
A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
The Home Edit's Clea Shearer Shares the Messy Truth About Her Cancer Recovery Experience
Inside Clean Energy: Explaining the Crisis in Texas
How Russia's war in Ukraine is changing the world's oil markets
A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
While The Fate Of The CFPB Is In Limbo, The Agency Is Cracking Down On Junk Fees
Warming Trends: Radio From a Future Free of Fossil Fuels, Vegetarianism Not Hot on Social Media and Overheated Umpires Make Bad Calls
Arkansas Gov. Sanders signs a law that makes it easier to employ children