Current:Home > ScamsAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -FundPrime
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-16 14:12:50
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (968)
Related
- Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
- The NIH halts a research project. Is it self-censorship?
- North Korean leader Kim tours weapons factories and vows to boost war readiness in face of tensions
- Gas prices rising again: See the top 10 states where gas is cheapest and most expensive
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- McConnell is warmly embraced by Kentucky Republicans amid questions about his health
- Overnight airstrikes kill three in Ukraine as Moscow airport halts flights after foiled drone attack
- Oregon extends crab fishing restrictions to protect whales from getting caught in trap ropes
- A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
- Phoenix Mercury star Brittney Griner returns after mental health break
Ranking
- Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
- Pope wraps up an improvised World Youth Day with 1.5 million attendees and a very big Mass
- Slain Parkland victim's father speaks out following reenactment
- Sealed first generation iPod bought as a Christmas gift in 2001 sells for $29,000
- Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
- Coroner identifies fleeing armed motorist fatally shot by Indianapolis officer during foot chase
- 5-year-old girl dies after being struck by starting gate at Illinois harness race
- Failed leaders and pathetic backstabbers are ruining college sports
Recommendation
Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
Kagan says Congress has power to regulate Supreme Court: We're not imperial
Husband of missing Georgia woman Imani Roberson charged with her murder
'Regression to the mean' USWNT's recent struggles are no predictor of game vs. Sweden
Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
NFL suspends Seahawks' Eskridge, Chiefs' Omenihu six games for violating conduct policy
Influencer to be charged after chaos erupts in New York City's Union Square
Slain Parkland victim's father speaks out following reenactment