Current:Home > StocksWisconsin criminal justice groups argue for invalidating constitutional amendments on bail -FundPrime
Wisconsin criminal justice groups argue for invalidating constitutional amendments on bail
View
Date:2025-04-17 01:29:54
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin criminal justice advocates argued in court Wednesday that Republican-backed cash bail constitutional amendments approved by voters last year should be invalidated over procedural flaws, a case that elections officials and the Legislature call a cynical attempt to undo election results.
Dane County Circuit Judge Rhonda Lanford did not rule from the bench following arguments. She said she would issue a written decision later.
The case revolves around whether the Legislature sent the ballot questions to the correct elections officials and whether deadlines for submission were met. If successful, the amendments could be struck from the state constitution and put on a future ballot for another vote.
One amendment allows judges to consider past convictions for violent crimes when setting bail for someone accused of a violent crime. Another allows judges to consider a defendant’s risk to public safety, including their criminal history, when setting bail required to release someone before trial.
Voters also approved an advisory referendum, which is not enforceable, saying that able-bodied, childless welfare recipients should be required to look for work.
The judge last year rejected the effort to stop the April 2023 vote on the three questions. She ruled then that those bringing the lawsuit failed to prove they would suffer “irreparable harm” if the measures were not blocked from appearing on the ballot.
Jeff Mandell, attorney for the criminal justice groups, argued Wednesday that the three measures were not properly submitted to the people and must be declared null and void.
“We’re not saying that these can never be a part of the constitution,” Mandell said. “All we’re saying is those who run our elections have to follow the law. People can vote on them again.”
Attorneys for the Legislature and state elections commission countered that the law was followed closely enough and a “minor procedural error” should not result in overturning the election results.
State law requires ballot questions to be “filed with the official or agency responsible for preparing the ballots” at least 70 days before the election. That made the deadline for the measures Jan. 25, 2023. The Legislature sent the measures to the Wisconsin Election Commission on Jan. 19, 2023, but the commission did not file the measures with county election officials until Jan. 26, 2023.
The groups suing argued that county election officials are responsible for preparing ballots, not the state commission, and therefore the Legislature filed the ballot questions in the wrong place.
The elections commission countered that it was not mandatory for the Legislature to submit the questions to county elections officials, and there’s no penalty for not doing it. Commission attorney Charlotte Gibson also argued that the 70-day deadline is not mandatory.
“There is no evidence that any voters — let alone a sufficient number of voters to change the election results — were misled in voting” for the resolutions due to the alleged procedural violation, the Legislature said in court filings.
The Legislature called the lawsuit a “meritless and cynically undemocratic attempt to undo the results of Wisconsin’s 2023 Spring Election,” where the measures were approved “overwhelmingly.”
The constitutional amendments were approved with 67% and 68% support, while 80% of voters approved of the welfare resolution.
WISDOM, a faith-based statewide organizing group, and its affiliate, EXPO Wisconsin, which stands for Ex-Incarcerated People Organizing, brought the lawsuit. Both groups fight against mass incarceration and work with people who have spent time behind bars.
veryGood! (63593)
Related
- Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
- Body of 20-year-old North Carolina man recovered after 400-foot fall at Grand Canyon National Park
- After Gershkovich and Whelan freed, this American teacher remains in Russian custody
- A sign spooky season is here: Spirit Halloween stores begin opening
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Average rate on a 30-year mortgage falls to 6.73%, lowest level since early February
- Cardi B files for divorce from Offset, posts she’s pregnant with their third child on Instagram
- Why do Olympic swimmers wear big parkas before racing? Warmth and personal pizzazz
- Have Dry, Sensitive Skin? You Need To Add These Gentle Skincare Products to Your Routine
- How to watch Lollapalooza: Megan Thee Stallion, Kesha scheduled on livestream Thursday
Ranking
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Simone Biles' 2024 Olympics Necklace Proves She's the GOAT After Gymnastics Gold Medal Win
- Mýa says being celibate for 7 years provided 'mental clarity'
- 2024 Olympics: Serena Williams' Husband Alexis Ohanian, Flavor Flav Pay Athlete Veronica Fraley’s Rent
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- On golf's first day at Paris Olympics, an 'awesome atmosphere' stole the show
- How high can Simone Biles jump? The answer may surprise you
- CrowdStrike sued by shareholders over huge software outage
Recommendation
Bill Belichick's salary at North Carolina: School releases football coach's contract details
Who is Paul Whelan? What to know about Michigan man freed from Russia
Two couples drop wrongful death suit against Alabama IVF clinic and hospital
Legislation will provide $100M in emergency aid to victims of wildfires and flooding in New Mexico
Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
Former CNN anchor Don Lemon sues Elon Musk over canceled X deal: 'Dragged Don's name'
Who’s part of the massive prisoner swap between Russia and the West?
Proposed rule would ban airlines from charging parents to sit with their children