Current:Home > StocksA federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court -FundPrime
A federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court
Johnathan Walker View
Date:2025-04-07 12:15:54
HOUSTON (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday declared illegal a revised version of a federal policy that prevents the deportation of hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the U.S. as children.
U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen agreed with Texas and eight other states suing to stop the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program. The judge’s ruling was ultimately expected to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, sending the program’s fate before the high court for a third time.
Hanen barred the government from approving any new applications, but left the program intact for existing recipients during the expected appeals process. Hanen said his order does not require the federal government to take any actions against DACA recipients.
The states have argued the Obama administration didn’t have the authority to first create the program in 2012 because it circumvented Congress.
In 2021, Hanen had declared the program illegal, ruling it had not been subject to public notice and comment periods required under the federal Administrative Procedures Act.
The Biden administration tried to satisfy Hanen’s concerns with a new version of DACA that took effect in October 2022 and was subject to public comments as part of a formal rule-making process.
But Hanen, who was appointed by then-President George W. Bush in 2002, ruled the updated version of DACA was still illegal. He had previously said DACA was unconstitutional and it would be up to Congress to enact legislation shielding people under the program, often known as “Dreamers.”
Hanen also had previously ruled the states had standing to file their lawsuit because they had been harmed by the program.
The states have claimed they incur hundreds of millions of dollars in health care, education and other costs when immigrants are allowed to remain in the country illegally. The states that sued are Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, West Virginia, Kansas and Mississippi.
Those defending the program — the federal government, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund and the state of New Jersey — had argued the states failed to present evidence that any of the costs they allege they have incurred have been tied to DACA recipients. They also argued Congress has given the Department of Homeland Security the legal authority to set immigration enforcement policies.
Despite previously declaring the DACA program illegal, Hanen had left the Obama-era program intact for those already benefiting from it. But he had ruled there could be no new applicants while appeals were pending.
There were 578,680 people enrolled in DACA at the end of March, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
The program has faced a roller coaster of court challenges over the years.
In 2016, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 over an expanded DACA and a version of the program for parents of DACA recipients. In 2020, the high court ruled 5-4 that the Trump administration improperly ended DACA, allowing it to stay in place.
In 2022, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld Hanen’s earlier ruling declaring DACA illegal, but sent the case back to him to review changes made to the program by the Biden administration.
President Joe Biden and advocacy groups have called on Congress to pass permanent protections for “ dreamers.” Congress has failed multiple times to pass proposals called the DREAM Act to protect DACA recipients.
veryGood! (2465)
Related
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- Court tosses Jan. 6 sentence in ruling that could impact other low-level Capitol riot cases
- Historic heat wave in Pacific Northwest may have killed 3 this week
- Angelina Jolie's LBD With Cutouts Is a Sexy Take on the Quiet Luxury Trend
- Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
- The 10 best Will Ferrell movies, ranked (from 'Anchorman' to 'Barbie' and 'Strays')
- The Perfect Fall Sweater Is Only $32 and You’ll Want 1 in Every Color
- Darius Jackson Speaks Out Amid Keke Palmer Breakup Reports
- The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
- Human trafficking: A network of crime hidden across a vast American landscape
Ranking
- Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
- Emerging economies are pushing to end the dollar’s dominance. But what’s the alternative?
- Millions of old analog photos are sitting in storage. Digitizing them can unlock countless memories
- Mortgage rates continue to climb — and could reach 8% soon
- Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
- Pilot accused of destroying parking barrier at Denver airport with an ax says he hit breaking point
- MLB reschedules Padres, Angels, Dodgers games because of Hurricane Hilary forecast
- World's cheapest home? Detroit-area listing turns heads with $1 price tag. Is it legit?
Recommendation
Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
Cyberattack keeps hospitals’ computers offline for weeks
Arizona AG investigating 2020 alleged fake electors tied to Trump
'Swamp Kings': Florida football docuseries rehashes Gators' era of success and swagger
Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
Hilary rapidly grows to Category 4 hurricane off Mexico and could bring heavy rain to US Southwest
Noah Lyles on Usain Bolt's 200-meter record: 'I know that I’m going to break it'
Leaders at 7 Jackson schools on leave amid testing irregularities probe